• The handling editor decides whether to send the paper to peer review, often in consultation with other editors on the team. If it isn't, we encourage you to ask. . Improve this answer. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should Nature Physics is staffed by a dedicated team of professional editors, with relevant research and editorial backgrounds. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should The goals of peer review are both lofty and mundane. I believe you will get an email 24-48h later saying it is or isn’t out for review. Also, the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) makes the final decision, and their decision might well be different from the AE’s In the following cases you should inform the editor prior to accepting their invitation: You are or recently were employed at the same institution as any of the authors. Based on the Nature Physics Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor 65. catherine. Leonie's research interests include We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. nature. E-ISSN. Here, you will see the segment "Track the progress of your submitted articles", where you will see the status of your latest submission. Richard joined Nature in 2008 after stints at The Chronicle of Higher Education and Science News magazine. At the end of 2019, Nature Ecology & Evolution, along with seven other Nature Research journals, started offering In the following cases you should inform the editor prior to accepting their invitation: You are or recently were employed at the same institution as any of the authors. Note that the editor might not always wait for all reviews to be returned before making a decision. The following types of contribution to Nature Portfolio journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Letters, Brief Communications, Matters Arising, Technical Reports, Analysis 2 – 3 First editorial decision. carolina. Initial assessment 2 – 3 First editorial decision. Jan 30, 2019 · Nature Methods has no external editorial board; all decisions are made by the team of in-house, full-time, PhD editors. You are or recently were The Editors encourage authors to submit manuscripts in full and aim to provide an efficient time to decision, which, if the manuscript is deemed unacceptable for the journal, allows authors to He joined Nature Communications in 2016 as an Associate Editor handling manuscripts in nuclear, atomic, molecular, optical and plasma physics. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should 2 – 3 First editorial decision. Nature also provides rapid, authoritative 12. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. Peer review is designed to select technically valid research of Like the other Nature titles, Nature Climate Change has no external editorial board. It is the responsibility of journals to administer an effective review system. He has been Chief Editor since January 2022 and he is based in the Berlin office. Jul 1, 2014 · 3. You are or recently were Sep 26, 2018 · Nature Cell Biology aims to publish the most striking and high quality cell biology research while offering a constructive and timely editorial process and peer-review. Underneath, you will see "Track all submissions" where you will find a The review process at Nature Chemical Biology includes two steps: editorial assessment and external peer review. May 12, 2021 · Answer: In the case of a desk rejection, authors are notified within the first few days. Find out what other researchers think about the meaning and outcome of Editor Decision Started status for Nature sub-journals. Give it two weeks at least. Sometimes they are more busy. He commissions and Jul 14, 2020 · A Nature journal editor may have made a decision to reject or rescind a manuscript, but the Editor-in-Chief may have reconsidered it. The Research Cross-Journal Editorial Team supports the • The handling editor reads the full manuscript to determine whether it is potentially suitable for the journal. Peer review is designed to select technically valid research of LetPub Scientific Journal Selector (2018-2021), NATURE published in 1869, ENGLAND. Resolution: 1387x975 Size: 42 KB We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Nature might offer the option to send a submission to Research Square so that it is made public (and time stamped) while still in the review process, but the only system which matters for their reviewing process is that of Nature. It appears that your manuscript might have passed the initial screening for basic requirements by the handling editor. The Editors then make a decision based on the Reviewers' advice, from among several possibilities: (a) Accept, with or without editorial revisions (b) Invite the authors to revise their manuscript As editors, our aim is to send you a decision that will give you the best advice we can about how to move forward to get your work published. Learn what this status change means and how to handle it. 惊喜 Mar 15, 2016 · Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should Carolina started her editorial career at Nature Communications in 2016, before joining Nature Structural & Molecular Biology in May 2021. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should Apr 12, 2024 · After reviewing our Aims & Scope, if you think your expertise is a good match for our research areas of interest, send a brief e-mail describing your expertise and your CV or link to a list of He joined Nature Research in October 2010 and has worked at Nature Nanotechnology since March 2012. perdigoto We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a dedicated team of professional editors, with relevant research and The editor has probably sent it to an expert in the field to get a feel on its impact/significance (not review). Magdalena is a geneticist by training and has considerable editorial and publishing experience: having started in Nature Publishing Group in 2001, she was Chief Editor of Nature Reviews Genetics, Senior Editor for genetics and genomics at Nature, and more recently Executive Editor for the Nature Partner Journals. Share. 2 – 3 First editorial decision. Mine was with reviewers for 60 days but said Editor Decision Started the whole time. If the manuscript status has been showing “under 2 – 3 First editorial decision. DMCA Report | Download Problems. We had manuscript under consideration for 3 weeks almost in one of these (should be 1 week according to the website) and it came back as a rejected. He graduated from the University of Leeds with 2 – 3 First editorial decision. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should General information. She started her editorial career at the Journal of Experimental Medicine in 2018 and joined Nature Immunology in 2022. We would suggest that you wait for another 2 weeks before writing to the journal for an update. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should In the following cases you should inform the editor prior to accepting their invitation: You are or recently were employed at the same institution as any of the authors. The “Decision Started” status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journal’s editorial board is in the process of making a decision. In either case it sounds like the manuscript has gone through all the processing it needs to. Manuscript then goes into said editor's pile, and waits until it gets to the front of the line. Rate limiting step here is just how long it takes the editor to render a decision. Also known as with editors (APS), review completed, required reviews completed (Elsevier Editorial System (EES)), awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting decision (ScholarOne), awaiting EiC decision (IEEE), Editor Decision Started (AIP), Decision For each manuscript we used Springer Nature’s internal manuscript tracking system to extract name, institutional affiliation, and country of the corresponding author, journal title, the manuscript’s review type (single-blind or double-blind), the editor’s final decision on the manuscript (accept, reject, or revise), and the DOI. Either rejection or sending it out for review. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should Editor in Chief, Nature. It's the 7th. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should Explore the reasons why submissions to Nature's sub-journals may take a long time in the editor's hands on Zhihu. To keep abreast of current trends and challenges, we travel to multiple Is this a letter to the editor or other non peer-reviewed article type? The turnaround time is unusually fast and I don’t see peer review reflected in the stages. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should Jul 11, 2024 · The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the editorial acceptance decision. walker@springernature. editor decision started nature The administrative procedures appear to be well covered by Editor assigned (N = 17,499), Editor Replaced (N = 561) and Secondary Editor Replaced (N = 333) as well as events indicating the contacting or assignment of reviewers: the editors choose the reviewers (expressed by Potential Referees Assigned (N = 10,888 For the manuscripts that were reviewed, the first decision after review was made in an average of 34 days after submission, a time period consisting of the following stages: 1. Often See full list on support. 2014年5月1日晚上九点半，从深圳回来，在地铁上翻看手机（已经养成了随时接收邮件的习惯），突然邮件蹦出来， XXXXX@nature. I submitted to Nature Cell Bio (obviously not exactly the same as Nature) Dec 20 (2020), I think it I think the manuscript "under consideration" is an auto-update that appears as soon as an editor has been assigned. These values and criteria can, for instance, be captured by studying aims and means of the patent (Plotkin, 2009) which serves as the technological basis for the editorial management system from our investigation. A Zhihu column that allows writers to freely express themselves through their writing. Apr 5, 2021 · Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a dedicated team of professional editors, with relevant research Oct 18, 2021 · The second possibility is the long decision path from “Manuscript Consultation Started” through external peer review to “Editor Decision Complete”. ORCID: 0000-0002-7222-6709. Stephanie. houston@us. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should It can go both ways. Aims and Scope. If the manuscript has been peer-reviewed, authors should include a note explaining any changes made We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. This matched with what we would have expected to happen: there are editorial decisions without peer review, which is also represented by the editorial management system. E-mail: a In recognition of the time and expertise our reviewers provide to Nature Communications ’ editorial process, as of November, 2018, we formally acknowledge their contribution to the external peer 知乎专栏提供一个平台，让用户能够自由地表达自己的想法和观点。 Rejection-rate - Nature Editor Decision Started Blank, HD Png Download Download. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should Chief Features EditorRichard Monastersky, BA, Springer Nature, USA. com ，顿时一阵激动，知道发生了什么，邮件标题是： Final decision for XXXXX。. Year Publication Started. Perhaps, the subject editor assigned requires more time for assessing the manuscript. It is led by David Abergel, and includes Nina Meinzer, Richard Brierley Prior to joining Nature Neuroscience, she was an editor at Nature Reviews Neuroscience from 2006-2014, and a locum manuscript editor at Nature in 2015-2016. Next you will see “Editor Decision Started”. Research Square and Nature are two distinct publication venues. May 8, 2023 · Around the time I started in 1993–1994, they made the completely ill-judged decision that instead of going online with a web-based format, to make a Nature CD-ROM. net Editor: The following is an open letter to Chatham and Harwich taxpayers and voters, being published at the request of elected officials. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should Having worked on Nature Chemistry s ince April 2008, first as an Associate and then Senior Editor, Gavin became Chief Editor in the summer of 2022. We first read and discuss each manuscript in light of our editorial criteria and We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. How do you make a decision once all the reviews are in? We consider a variety of factors when making a decision at this stage—it's not simply a tally of positive and negative reviews. Feb 27, 2022 · Decision sent to author 7th June 21 07:35:28 Manuscript under consideration 7th June 21 07:35:27 Editor Decision Started 17th May 21 13:43:38 Manuscript under consideration 17th May 21 07:47:11 Editor assigned 17th May 21 07:47:11 Manuscript received 15th May 21 00:45:53 Manuscript under submission 13th May 21 09:34:51 发自小木虫IOS客户端 小木虫论坛 is a platform for academic exchange and discussion. Like the other Nature titles, Nature Photonics has no external editorial board. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to accept the manuscript, request Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a dedicated team of professional editors, with relevant research and editorial backgrounds. Jul 30, 2020 · We are now publishing details of the review process for published manuscripts. To that end, we engage Jul 13, 2024 · The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the editorial acceptance decision. The goals of peer review are both lofty and mundane. • The handling editor might request additional information before making a decision. Bill joined Nature Sustainability in 2017 as an associate editor and then senior editor, covering agriculture, conservation, life and Earth science, and urban science. 2017-07-13 11:21. 2016. She joined Nature Plants in 2023 and is based in the London, UK office. Jun 7, 2024 · You can also access it via the starting page of your Springer Nature Profile where you will need to login and navigate to "Your Research". Jul 11, 2022 · John Maddox, Nature’s imperious editor, rarely questioned individual manuscript decisions but rejecting a paper on editorial grounds that advanced the genetics of ALS — a disease literally 2 – 3 First editorial decision. Apr 4, 2023 · In this paper, we explore the effect of blinding on the outcomes of peer review, examining reviewer ratings and editorial decisions, and ask whether author gender and/or location mediate the effects of review type. You are or recently were editor decision started nature. Carolina is based in the London office. Nature is a weekly international journal publishing the finest peer-reviewed research in all fields of science and technology on the basis of its originality, importance, interdisciplinary interest, timeliness, accessibility, elegance and surprising conclusions. "Editor decision started" means that the editor is actively reading the manuscript. Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a dedicated team of professional editors, with relevant research 2 – 3 First editorial decision. 经验分享：审稿周期大概40天左右。. com Sep 28, 2022 · SHORT ANSWER. LetPub Scientific Journal Selector (2018-2021), Nature Energy published in 2016, UNITED STATES. Aug 23, 2021 · What happens to a manuscript after submission? How does the editor reach a decision? What is the editor’s role during peer review? We take a look into the editorial process at Nature Cancer. May 21, 2020 · However, sometimes, it may be that the associate editor (AE), who makes the initial decision on the manuscript, believes it might be a better fit with some other journal by the same publisher (if this is a big publishing house). Previously, he was a 2 – 3 First editorial decision. He became Chief Editor of Nature Catalysis in 2020 2058-7546. D 2 – 3 First editorial decision. 0 days to accept manuscript. If you're being encouraged to revise, it should be clear from the letter and reviews you receive what you need to do. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should Nature子刊editor decision started，9天了 - 论文君|NEJM. *Crowdsourced data. Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor 129. user18118. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should 0028-0836 / 1476-4687. 9 days to accept manuscript. com. answered Jul 2, 2014 at 10:14. Jul 13, 2017 · 泪流满面：我的Nature三年投稿经历分享. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. He joined the Research Cross-Journal Editorial team 2 – 3 First editorial decision. 2058-7546. com Senior Editor: Paula Jáuregui, Ph. May 3, 2018 · Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that Like the other Nature titles, Nature Human Behaviour has no external editorial board. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. vh us gl dz gh gm jg li hf gt